Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Do egalitarians always help the disadvantaged more than the advantaged? Testing a value‐norm conflict hypothesis in Malaysia

Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin; Matos, Andrea Soledad

Authors

Andrea Soledad Matos



Abstract

Do egalitarians always express greater compassion towards the disadvantaged than towards the advantaged? A closer look at existing scholarship on the topic suggests that they likely do. Here, we investigated whether such tendency is also apparent within interdependent high-power distant cultures where the high-status privilege prevails. Given the emphasis on harmony in social relations in interdependent cultures, we reasoned that egalitarians might experience a dissonance between their private equity values and a societal norm prescribing high-status privilege, which we refer to as the value-norm conflict. We therefore proposed and found evidence in Malaysia (N = 273) that egalitarians succumbed to the normative high-status privilege in their culture by displaying greater compassion towards higher- than lower-status victims, but only when the cost of doing so was low. Interestingly, anti-egalitarians showed equitable levels of compassion to high- and low-status victims, but only when the personal cost for taking such action was also low. Hence, we show that even egalitarians can, at times, favor the privileged and anti-egalitarians can act equitably, so long as the personal cost of doing so is trivial for them.

Citation

Owuamalam, C. K., & Matos, A. S. (2019). Do egalitarians always help the disadvantaged more than the advantaged? Testing a value‐norm conflict hypothesis in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12351

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 2, 2018
Online Publication Date Dec 3, 2018
Publication Date 2019-06
Deposit Date Dec 6, 2023
Journal Asian Journal of Social Psychology
Print ISSN 1367-2223
Electronic ISSN 1467-839X
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 2
Pages 151-162
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12351
Keywords General Social Sciences; Social Psychology
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1983746