Anti-voluntarism, natural providence and miracles in Thomas Burnet's Theory of the Earth

Rossetter, Thomas

Abstract

In his Telluris Theoria Sacra and its English translation The Theory of the Earth (1681–90), the English clergyman and schoolmaster Thomas Burnet (c.1635–1715) constructed a geological history from the Creation to the Final Consummation, positing predominantly natural causes to explain biblical events and their effects on the Earth and life on it. Burnet's insistence on appealing primarily to natural rather than miraculous causes has been interpreted both by his contemporaries and by some historians as an essentially Cartesian principle. On this reading, Burnet adhered to a Cartesian style of explanation in which there was no place for miracles. In this paper, I propose a different interpretation. Burnet's commitment to natural over miraculous causes, I argue, was grounded in an anti-voluntarist theology which he inherited from the Cambridge Platonists and Latitudinarians. This anti-voluntarism, moreover, also dictated the kind of miracles to which he did appeal. This reading of Burnet contrasts with the view that he was simply following Cartesian principles. First, Descartes had espoused a radical form of theological voluntarism. Second, Burnet's and Descartes's views of providence were based on distinct attributes of God, and these attributes had quite different implications regarding the place of miracles in the providential order.

Citation

Rossetter, T. (2023). Anti-voluntarism, natural providence and miracles in Thomas Burnet's Theory of the Earth. British Journal for the History of Science, 56(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000462

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 19, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Dec 19, 2022
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Deposit Date: Nov 2, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Nov 2, 2023
• Journal: The British Journal for the History of Science
• Print ISSN: 0007-0874
• Electronic ISSN: 1474-001X
• Publisher: Wiley
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 56
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-20
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087422000462
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1875432