Will Virtual Hearings Remain in Post-pandemic International Arbitration?

Chen, Lei

Abstract

The pandemic has catalysed to hasten the wider use of virtual hearings in international arbitration. However, the promotion of virtual hearings in international commercial dispute resolution was more complex than commonly thought due to the highlighted concerns of cybersecurity and breach of confidentiality in arbitration. The worries against the wide use of virtual hearings cannot stand because technological innovations can largely improve and solve this. However, virtual arbitration hearings may not be common post-COVID times. Technology shapes how people behave, interact, grow, and develop in their relationships with others and wider communities. Yet greater immersion in the digital world undoubtedly creates new challenges and can adversely affect human-to-human interactions. There is very little scientific study on the psychological impacts of virtual hearings on arbitrators, witnesses and counsels. It is too early to assess its effectiveness from the user's perspective until the much-needed scientific data is released. Virtual hearings are unlikely to replace in-person ones necessary for more complex and high-value disputes requiring greater interaction and personal connection. Strategically, international arbitration is a private initiative-orientated, flexible, and market-driven dispute resolution mechanism. The parties are best positioned to choose the hearing format after balancing off.

Citation

Chen, L. (2024). Will Virtual Hearings Remain in Post-pandemic International Arbitration?. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 37(3), 829-849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10054-7

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 16, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Oct 3, 2023
• Publication Date: May 1, 2024
• Deposit Date: Oct 5, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 6, 2023
• Journal: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
• Print ISSN: 0952-8059
• Electronic ISSN: 1572-8722
• Publisher: Springer
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 37
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 829-849
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10054-7
• Keywords: Psychological impact, Confidentiality, Virtual hearing, International arbitration, Cybersecurity, Technology
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1758319