Dr James Miller james.miller@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
What Counts as a 'Good Metaphysical Language'?
Miller, J.T.M.
Authors
Contributors
Dr James Miller james.miller@durham.ac.uk
Editor
Abstract
The objectively best language is intended to refer to some metaphysically privileged language that ‘carves reality at its joints’ perfectly. That is, it is the kind of language that various ‘metaphysical deflationists’ have argued is impossible. One common line of argument amongst deflationists is that we have no means to compare languages that all express true facts about the world in such a way to decide which is ‘better’. For example, the language is physics is not objectively better than the language of economics, as each language has the semantic purpose of expressing some domain of truths about the world inexpressible in the other language, and therefore neither could be ‘objectively best’. This chapter argues that metaphysical deflationists have failed to recognize a distinction between fine- and coarse-grained semantic purposes of languages, and that a recognition of that distinction provides us grounds to compare languages to see which is objectively best. It argues that once we recognize the distinction between fine- and coarse-grained semantic purposes, then we can see that it is relative to the coarse-grained purpose that we must compare putative objectively best ontological languages.
Citation
Miller, J. (2021). What Counts as a 'Good Metaphysical Language'?. In J. Miller (Ed.), The Language of Ontology (102-118). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895332.003.0007
Online Publication Date | Jun 10, 2021 |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2021-07 |
Deposit Date | Jun 9, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 10, 2023 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 102-118 |
Series Title | Mind Association Occasional Series |
Book Title | The Language of Ontology. |
Chapter Number | 6 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895332.003.0007 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1653947 |
Publisher URL | https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780192895332.001.0001/oso-9780192895332-chapter-7 |
Files
Accepted Book Chapter
(255 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
The Language of Ontology edited by J. T. M. Miller, 2021, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780192895332.001.0001/oso-9780192895332
You might also like
How to Misspell 'Paris'
(2024)
Journal Article
Who’s Afraid of Conceptual Analysis?
(2023)
Book Chapter
Metaphysical Realism and Anti-realism
(2022)
Book
Sameness of Word
(2022)
Journal Article
Hyperintensionality and Ontological Categories
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search