Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Between places: producing hubs, flows, and networks

Crang, M.



Tim Cresswell (2001) recently suggested two causes for an upsurge of interest in `mobility': first, an increase in `empirical' mobility and, second, a new theoretical approach to mobility with a rejection of the metaphysics of sedentarism. Cultural theory, it is true, has tended to overgeneralise and underplay differences between kinds of movements, risking a celebratory tone and underplaying power relations of its production by treating it as a metaphor for consumption. However, the revalorisation of mobility is not just occurring in cultural studies but also where invocations of `spaces of flows' (after Castells, 1996) have claimed to set a new agenda for urbanm studies, where Guido Martinotti (1999) critiques sedentarist and residentialist assumptions about urban citizenship pointing to the flows of students, tourists, and commuters forming transient populations of cities' and John Urry (2000) sets a broader manifesto for a `sociology of fluids' rather than basing analysis on static units. In this piece I want to suggest we need to examine how mobility is produced through specific spaces.


Crang, M. (2002). Between places: producing hubs, flows, and networks. Environment and Planning A, 34(4), 569-574.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2002
Deposit Date Oct 1, 2008
Journal Environment and Planning A
Print ISSN 0308-518X
Electronic ISSN 1472-3409
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 34
Issue 4
Pages 569-574
Publisher URL