Aaron Baker
Proportional, Not Strict, Scrutiny: Against a U.S. Suspect Classifications Model under Article 14 ECHR in the U.K
Baker, Aaron
Authors
Abstract
This article maintains that U.K. courts, in applying Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), should under no circumstances emulate the U.S. Equal Protection Clause (EPC) approach to justifying state discrimination, and that to do so would fly in the face of Strasbourg precedent and common sense. To support these contentions this article first analyzes some illustrative U.K. discrimination cases to evaluate to what extent and why the United Kingdom appears to lean in the direction of a "suspect classifications" approach to justification of discriminatory treatment. It then explains how U.S. courts handle justification under the EPC, offering a critical assessment of (1) the reasons for the evolution of that approach, and (2) its coherence and success. The article then analyzes, by comparison, the approach of the European Court of Human Rights to Article 14 justification, noting the inconsistency of the Strasbourg teaching with a U.S.-style methodology. The article concludes that the U.S. model arises from a completely different jurisprudential tradition and logic than the ECHR's proportionality model. The United Kingdom should thus reject the U.S. practice of applying discrete levels of scrutiny depending on the degree to which a classification is "suspect."
Citation
Baker, A. (2008). Proportional, Not Strict, Scrutiny: Against a U.S. Suspect Classifications Model under Article 14 ECHR in the U.K. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 56(4), 847-894. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2007.0030
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2008 |
Deposit Date | Feb 24, 2012 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 1, 2012 |
Journal | American Journal of Comparative Law |
Print ISSN | 0002-919X |
Electronic ISSN | 2326-9197 |
Publisher | American Society of Comparative Law |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 56 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 847-894 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2007.0030 |
Keywords | Discrimination, Article 14, Equal Protection, Proportionality, Suspect Classifications, HRA 1998. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1563235 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(3.2 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
The ‘Range of Reasonable Responses’ test: A Poor ‘Substitution’ for the Statutory Language
(2020)
Journal Article
Proportionality
(2017)
Book Chapter
Policing, Profiling and Discrimination Law: US and European Approaches Compared
(2011)
Journal Article
Proportionality
(2010)
Book Chapter
Smith and Wood's Employment Law
(2010)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search