A. Baker
Comparison Tainted by Justification: Against A 'Compendious Question' in Article 14 Discrimination
Baker, A.
Authors
Citation
Baker, A. (2006). Comparison Tainted by Justification: Against A 'Compendious Question' in Article 14 Discrimination. Public Law, 3, 476-497
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2006 |
Deposit Date | Oct 31, 2008 |
Journal | Public Law |
Print ISSN | 0033-3565 |
Publisher | Sweet and Maxwell |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 3 |
Pages | 476-497 |
Keywords | Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, Discrimination, Proportionality, Comparators. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1563227 |
Publisher URL | http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=469&productid=7106 |
You might also like
The ‘Range of Reasonable Responses’ test: A Poor ‘Substitution’ for the Statutory Language
(2020)
Journal Article
Proportionality
(2017)
Book Chapter
Policing, Profiling and Discrimination Law: US and European Approaches Compared
(2011)
Journal Article
Proportionality
(2010)
Book Chapter
Smith and Wood's Employment Law
(2010)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search