Christopher Riley c.a.riley@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
In long-term contractual relationships, such as those between a company’s shareholders, adjustments to the terms of the relationship are likely to be necessary over time. In a stimulating article, Professor Hansmann has argued that this necessity entails an advantage of the law’s ‘default rules’, compared to the parties’ own express terms. The state is likely to update its default rules over time and, as it does so, the terms of the parties’ contracts that incorporate such defaults are likewise updated automatically. Updating the parties’ express terms, by contrast, may require the unanimous agreement of all contracting parties, or at least a special majority, opening up the likelihood of minority vetoes and opportunism. This ‘dynamic’ advantage of legal defaults best explains, Hansmann argues, the paucity of express contracting amongst shareholders. In the UK, however, the main body of company law’s default rules are found in the model articles of association. Yet those who accept these rules are not bound by subsequent amendments to them. This article seeks to explain, and to justify, this feature of UK company law. In so doing, it casts doubt on the preference of shareholders to allow a third party – even one as trusted as the state – to update automatically the terms of their relationship.
Riley, C. (2010). The Not-so Dynamic Quality of Corporate Law: A UK Perspective on Hansmann's 'Corporation and Contract'. King's Law Journal, 21(3), 469-494. https://doi.org/10.5235/096157610793391553
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2010 |
Deposit Date | Oct 25, 2010 |
Journal | King's Law Journal |
Print ISSN | 0961-5768 |
Electronic ISSN | 1757-8442 |
Publisher | Dickson Poon School of Law |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 21 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 469-494 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5235/096157610793391553 |
Keywords | Company law, Corporate law, Contractarianism, Articles of association. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1547581 |
Board Gender Diversity in Mexico: An Analysis and Proposal for Reform
(2020)
Journal Article
Derivative claims and ratification: Time to ditch some baggage
(2013)
Journal Article
The Case for Non-Governing Directors in Not-for-Profit Companies
(2010)
Journal Article
An Annotated guide to the Companies Act
(2010)
Book Chapter
Theorising the governance of not-for-profits
(2007)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search