Dr Alison Lane a.r.lane@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Dr Alison Lane a.r.lane@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Professor Dan Smith daniel.smith2@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Professor Amanda Ellison amanda.ellison@durham.ac.uk
Professor
T. Schenk
Patients with homonymous visual field defects experience disabling functional impairments as a consequence of their visual loss. Compensatory visual exploration training aims to improve the searching skills of these patients in order to help them to cope more effectively. However, until now the efficacy of this training has not been compared to that of a control intervention. Given that exploration training uses the visual search paradigm, which is known to require visual attention, in this study the efficacy of the technique was compared with training that requires visual attention but not exploration. Participants completed either exploration training (n = 21), or attention training followed by exploration training (n = 21). Assessment of the visual field, visual search, reading and activities of daily living were performed before and after each intervention that the participants completed. The results revealed that both the exploration training and the attention training led to significant improvements in most of the visual tasks. For most of the tasks exploration training did not prove superior to attention training, and for reading both types of intervention failed to yield any benefits. The results indicate that attention plays a large role in the rehabilitation of homonymous visual field defects.
Lane, A., Smith, D., Ellison, A., & Schenk, T. (2010). Visual exploration training is no better than attention training for treating hemianopia. Brain, 133(6), 1717-1728. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq088
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 1, 2010 |
Deposit Date | May 21, 2010 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 1, 2011 |
Journal | Brain |
Print ISSN | 0006-8950 |
Electronic ISSN | 1460-2156 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 133 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 1717-1728 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq088 |
Keywords | Compensation, Hemianopia, Rehabilitation, Visual attention. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1521022 |
Publisher URL | http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/awq088? |
Accepted Journal Article
(783 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copy-editing author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Brain following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Lane, A.R. and Smith, D.T. and Ellison, A. and Schenk, T. (2010) 'Visual exploration training is no better than attention training for treating hemianopia.', Brain, 133(6): 1717-1728 is available online at: http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/6/3389
A Scoping Review of the Effects of Ambient Air Quality on Cognitive Frailty
(2023)
Journal Article
Uncovering the social determinants of brain injury rehabilitation
(2023)
Journal Article
The effects of induced optical blur on visual search performance and training
(2021)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search