Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

On the alert: future priorities for alerts in clinical decision support for computerized physician order entry identified from a European workshop

Coleman, J.J.; van der Sijs, H.; Haefeli, W.E.; Slight, S.P.; McDowell, S.E.; Seidling, H.M.; Eiermann, B.; Aarts, J.; Ammenwerth, E.; Ferner, R.E.; Slee, A.

On the alert: future priorities for alerts in clinical decision support for computerized physician order entry identified from a European workshop Thumbnail


Authors

J.J. Coleman

H. van der Sijs

W.E. Haefeli

S.P. Slight

S.E. McDowell

H.M. Seidling

B. Eiermann

J. Aarts

E. Ammenwerth

R.E. Ferner

A. Slee



Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) for electronic prescribing systems (computerized physician order entry) should help prescribers in the safe and rational use of medicines. However, the best ways to alert users to unsafe or irrational prescribing are uncertain. Specifically, CDS systems may generate too many alerts, producing unwelcome distractions for prescribers, or too few alerts running the risk of overlooking possible harms. Obtaining the right balance of alerting to adequately improve patient safety should be a priority. Methods: A workshop funded through the European Regional Development Fund was convened by the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust to assess current knowledge on alerts in CDS and to reach a consensus on a future research agenda on this topic. Leading European researchers in CDS and alerts in electronic prescribing systems were invited to the workshop. Results: We identified important knowledge gaps and suggest research priorities including (1) the need to determine the optimal sensitivity and specificity of alerts; (2) whether adaptation to the environment or characteristics of the user may improve alerts; and (3) whether modifying the timing and number of alerts will lead to improvements. We have also discussed the challenges and benefits of using naturalistic or experimental studies in the evaluation of alerts and suggested appropriate outcome measures. Conclusions: We have identified critical problems in CDS, which should help to guide priorities in research to evaluate alerts. It is hoped that this will spark the next generation of novel research from which practical steps can be taken to implement changes to CDS systems that will ultimately reduce alert fatigue and improve the design of future systems.

Citation

Coleman, J., van der Sijs, H., Haefeli, W., Slight, S., McDowell, S., Seidling, H., …Slee, A. (2013). On the alert: future priorities for alerts in clinical decision support for computerized physician order entry identified from a European workshop. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, Article 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-111

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 25, 2013
Online Publication Date Oct 1, 2013
Publication Date Oct 1, 2013
Deposit Date Oct 29, 2013
Publicly Available Date Mar 31, 2014
Journal BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 13
Article Number 111
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-111
Keywords Clinical Decision Support Systems, Medical Order Entry Systems.
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1475444

Files

Published Journal Article (225 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© 2013 Coleman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations