Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Seismic mountain building: Landslides associated with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in the context of a generalized model for earthquake volume balance

Li, G.; West, A.J.; Densmore, A.L.; Jin, Z.; Parker, R.N.; Hilton, R.G.

Seismic mountain building: Landslides associated with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in the context of a generalized model for earthquake volume balance Thumbnail


Authors

G. Li

A.J. West

Z. Jin

R.N. Parker

R.G. Hilton



Abstract

Here we assess earthquake volume balance and the growth of mountains in the context of a new landslide inventory for the Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in central China. Coseismic landslides were mapped from high-resolution remote imagery using an automated algorithm and manual delineation, which allow us to distinguish clustered landslides that can bias landslide volume calculations. Employing a power-law landslide area-volume relation, we find that the volume of landslide-associated mass wasting (∼2.8 + 0.9/−0.7 km3) is lower than previously estimated (∼5.7–15.2 km3) and comparable to the volume of rock uplift (∼2.6 ± 1.2 km3) during the Wenchuan earthquake. If fluvial evacuation removes landslide debris within the earthquake cycle, then the volume addition from coseismic uplift will be effectively offset by landslide erosion. If all earthquakes in the region followed this volume budget pattern, the efficient counteraction of coseismic rock uplift raises a fundamental question about how earthquakes build mountainous topography. To provide a framework for addressing this question, we explore a group of scaling relations to assess earthquake volume balance. We predict coseismic uplift volumes for thrust-fault earthquakes based on geophysical models for coseismic surface deformation and relations between fault rupture parameters and moment magnitude, Mw. By coupling this scaling relation with landslide volume-Mw scaling, we obtain an earthquake volume balance relation in terms of moment magnitude Mw, which is consistent with the revised Wenchuan landslide volumes and observations from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Incorporating the Gutenburg-Richter frequency-Mw relation, we use this volume balance to derive an analytical expression for crustal thickening from coseismic deformation based on an index of seismic intensity over a defined area. This model yields reasonable rates of crustal thickening from coseismic deformation (e.g., ∼0.1–0.5 km Ma−1 in tectonically active convergent settings), and implies that moderate magnitude earthquakes (Mw ≈ 6–7) are likely responsible for most of the coseismic contribution to rock uplift because of their smaller landslide-associated volume reduction. Our first-order model does not consider a range of factors (e.g., lithology, climate conditions, epicentral depth, and tectonic setting), nor does it account for viscoelastic effects or isostatic responses to erosion, and there are important large uncertainties on the scaling relationships used to quantify coseismic deformation. Nevertheless, our study provides a conceptual framework and invites more rigorous modeling of seismic mountain building.

Citation

Li, G., West, A., Densmore, A., Jin, Z., Parker, R., & Hilton, R. (2014). Seismic mountain building: Landslides associated with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in the context of a generalized model for earthquake volume balance. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(4), 833-844. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gc005067

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 14, 2014
Online Publication Date Apr 11, 2014
Publication Date Apr 11, 2014
Deposit Date Mar 13, 2014
Publicly Available Date Apr 30, 2014
Journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Electronic ISSN 1525-2027
Publisher American Geophysical Union
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 4
Pages 833-844
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gc005067
Keywords Wenchuan earthquake, Earthquake, Volume balance, Seismic mountain building, Landslide.
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1468008

Files

Published Journal Article (Advance online version) (961 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Advance online version © 2014. American Geophysical Union






You might also like



Downloadable Citations