J. Glaesser
Exploring the consequences of a recalibration of causal conditions when assessing sufficiency with fuzzy set QCA
Glaesser, J.; Cooper, B.
Authors
B. Cooper
Abstract
The use of Charles Ragin’s Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is increasing in the social sciences. However, some of its characteristics, especially those of its fuzzy set variant, are still not well understood by users. QCA, a set theoretic method, aims to describe, in a Boolean form, the configurations of conditions that are necessary and/or sufficient for some outcome. The calibration of set memberships is a central feature. We discuss how two alternative calibrations of a condition affect the assessment of consistency with sufficiency. Using first an abstract example and then an empirical one from the sociology of education, we explain why “stricter” calibration of conditions results in higher consistency with sufficiency. We demonstrate that conventional truth table analysis is not an ideal way to compare the analytic consequences of alternative calibrations and therefore employ an alternative which allows a more direct comparison of consistency indices while keeping comparative configurational contexts intact.
Citation
Glaesser, J., & Cooper, B. (2014). Exploring the consequences of a recalibration of causal conditions when assessing sufficiency with fuzzy set QCA. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(4), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.769782
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 21, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 18, 2013 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Mar 20, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | May 8, 2013 |
Journal | International Journal of Social Research Methodology |
Print ISSN | 1364-5579 |
Electronic ISSN | 1464-5300 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 17 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 387-401 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.769782 |
Keywords | Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), fuzzy sets, calibration, sufficiency, consistency index |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1464273 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(510 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in International Journal of Social Research Methodology on 28/03/2013, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13645579.2013.769782.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search