Professor Nadin Beckmann nadin.beckmann@durham.ac.uk
Professor
A problem shared is learning doubled: Deliberative processing in dyads improves learning in complex dynamic decision-making tasks
Beckmann, N.; Beckmann, J.F.; Birney, D.P.; Wood, R.E.
Authors
Professor Jens Beckmann j.beckmann@durham.ac.uk
Professor
D.P. Birney
R.E. Wood
Abstract
Whilst micro-worlds or simulations have increasingly been used in higher education settings, students do not always benefit as expected from these learning opportunities. By using an experimental-control group design we tested the effectiveness of structuring the task environment so as to encourage learners to approach simulations more systematically. Seventy-one professionals who participated in a postgraduate-level management program worked on a management simulation either individually (n = 35) or in dyads (n = 36) while exploring the simulation (exploration phase). Peer interactions in the shared learning condition were structured so that learners were encouraged to employ hypothesis testing strategies. All participants then completed the simulation again individually so as to demonstrate what they had learned (performance phase). Baseline measures of cognitive ability and personality were also collected. Learners who explored the simulation in the shared learning condition outperformed their counterparts who explored the simulation individually. A simple manipulation of the way learners interacted with the simulation facilitated learning. Improved deliberation is discussed as a potential cause of this effect, preliminary evidence is provided. This study lends further evidence that the effectiveness of learning using simulations is co-determined by characteristics of the learning environment.
Citation
Beckmann, N., Beckmann, J., Birney, D., & Wood, R. (2015). A problem shared is learning doubled: Deliberative processing in dyads improves learning in complex dynamic decision-making tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 654-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.052
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 12, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 5, 2015 |
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jan 19, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 10, 2015 |
Journal | Computers in Human Behavior |
Print ISSN | 0747-5632 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-7692 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 48 |
Pages | 654-662 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.052 |
Keywords | Simulations, Hypothesis testing, Adult learning, Learning environment, Learner dyads. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1447054 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(961 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 48, July 2015, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.052.
You might also like
Dynamic testing of language learning aptitude: an exploratory proof of concept study
(2024)
Journal Article
The role of learning in complex problem solving using MicroDYN
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search