Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Agreement between two methods of dietary data collection in female, adolescent netball players

Rumbold, P.L.S.; St Clair Gibson, A.; Stevenson, E.; 8Dodd-Reynolds, C.J.

Authors

P.L.S. Rumbold

A. St Clair Gibson

E. Stevenson

C.J. 8Dodd-Reynolds



Contributors

Abstract

The accuracy of a combined dietary data collection method (self-reported, weighed food diary and 24-h recall technique) in 13 female, adolescent netball players (14–16 years) was explored. The girls were observed for a 12 h period (08:00–20:00), during which food and drink items were available ad libitum throughout the day and for the period between 20:00 and 08:00 the following morning. All items were covertly weighed before and after consumption to calculate observed energy intake. To calculate participant reported energy intake, food and drink items were weighed and recorded in a food diary by the participants, which was then supplemented with information from the 24-h recall the following morning. Agreement between observed and participant reported energy intake was calculated using the Bland and Altman technique. The mean difference between observed and participant reported energy intake was 0.46 MJ d−1 (change in mean of 4.2%) indicating a slight bias towards over-reporting using the combined dietary data collection method. There was good agreement at the group level with the confidence interval for bias ranging from 0.00 to 0.92 MJ d−1. The combined dietary data collection method is an effective technique to employ in 14–16-year old, female adolescent netball players when quantifying energy intake.

Citation

Rumbold, P., St Clair Gibson, A., Stevenson, E., & 8Dodd-Reynolds, C. (2011). Agreement between two methods of dietary data collection in female, adolescent netball players. Appetite, 56(2), 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.013

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 17, 2011
Online Publication Date Jun 24, 2011
Publication Date 2011-10
Deposit Date Sep 3, 2014
Journal Appetite
Print ISSN 0195-6663
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 56
Issue 2
Pages 443-447
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.013
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1424169