Professor Nancy Cartwright nancy.cartwright@durham.ac.uk
Professor
For evidence-based practice and policy, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the current gold standard. But exactly why? We know that RCTs do not, without a series of strong assumptions, warrant predictions about what happens in practice. But just what are these assumptions? I maintain that, from a philosophical stance, answers to both questions are obscured because we don't attend to what causal claims say. Causal claims entering evidence-based medicine at different points say different things and, I would suggest, failure to attend to these differences makes much current guidance about evidence for medical and social policy misleading.
Cartwright, N. (2011). A philosopher's view of the long road from RCTs to effectiveness. The Lancet, 377(9775), 1400-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736%2811%2960563-1
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2011-04 |
Deposit Date | Sep 17, 2015 |
Journal | The Lancet |
Print ISSN | 0140-6736 |
Electronic ISSN | 1474-547X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Volume | 377 |
Issue | 9775 |
Pages | 1400-1401 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736%2811%2960563-1 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/philosophy/2007_ThelongroadfromRCTstoeffectiveness.doc |
Commentary: Why Mixed Methods Are Necessary for Evaluating Any Policy
(2019)
Book Chapter
Will Your Policy Work? Experiments versus Models
(2018)
Book Chapter
Are laws of nature consistent with contingency?
(2018)
Book Chapter
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search