Dr Matthew David matthew.david@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
UK media coverage of global university league tables shows systematic bias towards the Russell Group, although also highlighting tensions within its membership. Coverage positions UK ‘elite’ institutions between US superiority and Asian ascent. Coverage claims that league table results warrant UK university funding reform. However, league table data for all years to 2012 (when major funding reforms were implemented – most radically in England) do not show either US superiority or Asian ascent. Citation bias defines media content. Text itself is structured by three discursive ‘ratchets’: highlighting US successes but never failures, rising Asian institutions but never falls, and claiming that UK results warrant the same policy irrespective of whether results improve or worsen. These combine with selective doubt by ‘elites’ who question but are not questioned. These four discursive mechanisms fabricate an illusory threat of global competition. This threat is then used to warrant neo-liberal policies at home.
David, M. (2016). Fabricated world class: global university league tables, status differentiation and myths of global competition. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1096190
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 16, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 23, 2015 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Sep 18, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 23, 2017 |
Journal | British Journal of Sociology of Education |
Print ISSN | 0142-5692 |
Electronic ISSN | 1465-3346 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 37 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 169-189 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1096190 |
Keywords | League tables, Universities, Media, Globalization, Thematic analysis, Discursive mechanisms. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1422474 |
Accepted Journal Article
(422 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in British Journal of Sociology of Education on 23/12/2015, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01425692.2015.1096190.
Ten dimensions of dispute over moral panic theory in an age of COVID-19
(2024)
Book Chapter
Discovering Sociology
(2021)
Book
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search