Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Career adaptability and perceived overqualification: Testing a dual-path model among Chinese human resource management professionals.

Yang, W.; Guan, Y.; She, Z.; Lai, X.; Lockwood, A.

Authors

W. Yang

Z. She

X. Lai

A. Lockwood



Abstract

Based on career construction theory, the current research examined the relationship between career adaptability and perceived overqualification among a sample of Chinese human resource management professionals (N = 220). The results of a survey study showed that career adaptability predicted perceived overqualification through a dual-path model: On the one hand, career adaptability positively predicted employees' perceived delegation, which had a subsequent negative effect on perceived overqualification. At the same time, career adaptability also positively predicted career anchor in challenge, which in turn positively predicted overqualification. This dual-path mediation model provides a novel perspective to understand the mechanisms through which career adaptability affects perceived overqualification, and demonstrates the coexistence of opposite effects in this process. In addition, the results also showed that the effects of perceived delegation and career anchor in challenge on perceived overqualification were stronger among employees with a higher (vs. lower) level of organizational tenure. These findings carry implications for both career development theories and organizational management practices.

Citation

Yang, W., Guan, Y., She, Z., Lai, X., & Lockwood, A. (2015). Career adaptability and perceived overqualification: Testing a dual-path model among Chinese human resource management professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.08.007

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 13, 2015
Online Publication Date Aug 28, 2015
Publication Date 2015-10
Deposit Date May 12, 2016
Journal Journal of Vocational Behavior
Print ISSN 0001-8791
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 90
Pages 154-162
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.08.007
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1412393