R.T. Pitman
The conservation costs of game ranching
Pitman, R.T.; Fattebert, J.; Williams, S.T.; Williams, K.S.; Hill, R.A.; Hunter, L.T.B.; Slotow, R.; Balme, G.A.
Authors
J. Fattebert
S.T. Williams
K.S. Williams
Professor Russell Hill r.a.hill@durham.ac.uk
Professor
L.T.B. Hunter
R. Slotow
G.A. Balme
Abstract
The devolution of user rights of wildlife in southern Africa has led to a widespread land-use shift from livestock farming to game ranching. The economic advantages of game ranching over livestock farming are significant, but so too are the risks associated with breeding financially valuable game where free-ranging wildlife pose a credible threat. Here, we assessed whether the conservation potential of game ranching, and a decentralized approach to conservation more generally, may be undermined by an increase in human–wildlife conflict. We demonstrate that game rancher tolerance towards free-ranging wildlife has significantly decreased as the game ranching industry has evolved. Our findings reveal a conflict of interest between wealth and wildlife conservation resulting from local decision making in the absence of adequate centralized governance and evidence-based best practice. As a fundamental pillar of devolution-based natural resource management, game ranching proves an important mechanism for economic growth, albeit at a significant cost to conservation.
Citation
Pitman, R., Fattebert, J., Williams, S., Williams, K., Hill, R., Hunter, L., …Balme, G. (2016). The conservation costs of game ranching. Conservation Letters, 10(4), 402-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12276
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 12, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 26, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jul 26, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Journal | Conservation Letters |
Publisher | Society for Conservation Biology |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 402-412 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12276 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1409698 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(795 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Published Journal Article (Advance online version)
(800 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Advance online version
Accepted Journal Article
(1.5 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2016 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Behavioural compatibility, not fear, best predicts the looking patterns of chacma baboons
(2024)
Journal Article
Leopard density and determinants of space use in a farming landscape in South Africa
(2024)
Journal Article
Tropical field stations yield high conservation return on investment
(2024)
Journal Article
Efficient data collection for camera trap‐based density estimation: A preliminary assessment
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search