Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A Systematic Review Of The Types And Causes Of Prescribing Errors Generated From Using Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems in Primary and Secondary Care

Brown, C.L.; Mulcaster, H.L.; Triffitt, K.L.; Sittig, D.F.; Ash, J.; Reygate, K.; Husband, A.K.; Bates, D.W.; Slight, S.P.

A Systematic Review Of The Types And Causes Of Prescribing Errors Generated From Using Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems in Primary and Secondary Care Thumbnail


Authors

C.L. Brown

H.L. Mulcaster

K.L. Triffitt

D.F. Sittig

J. Ash

K. Reygate

A.K. Husband

D.W. Bates

S.P. Slight



Abstract

Objective To understand the different types and causes of prescribing errors associated with computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and recommend improvements in these systems. Materials and Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature published between January 2004 and June 2015 using three large databases: the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Medline. Studies that reported qualitative data about the types and causes of these errors were included. A narrative synthesis of all eligible studies was undertaken. Results A total of 1185 publications were identified, of which 34 were included in the review. We identified 8 key themes associated with CPOE-related prescribing errors: computer screen display, drop-down menus and auto-population, wording, default settings, nonintuitive or inflexible ordering, repeat prescriptions and automated processes, users’ work processes, and clinical decision support systems. Displaying an incomplete list of a patient’s medications on the computer screen often contributed to prescribing errors. Lack of system flexibility resulted in users employing error-prone workarounds, such as the addition of contradictory free-text comments. Users’ misinterpretations of how text was presented in CPOE systems were also linked with the occurrence of prescribing errors. Discussion and Conclusions Human factors design is important to reduce error rates. Drop-down menus should be designed with safeguards to decrease the likelihood of selection errors. Development of more sophisticated clinical decision support, which can perform checks on free-text, may also prevent errors. Further research is needed to ensure that systems minimize error likelihood and meet users’ workflow expectations.

Citation

Brown, C., Mulcaster, H., Triffitt, K., Sittig, D., Ash, J., Reygate, K., …Slight, S. (2017). A Systematic Review Of The Types And Causes Of Prescribing Errors Generated From Using Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems in Primary and Secondary Care. JAMIA: A Scholarly Journal of Informatics in Health and Biomedicine, 24(2), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw119

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 8, 2016
Online Publication Date Aug 30, 2016
Publication Date Mar 1, 2017
Deposit Date Jul 11, 2016
Publicly Available Date Aug 30, 2017
Journal Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Print ISSN 1067-5027
Electronic ISSN 1527-974X
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 2
Pages 432-440
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw119

Files

Accepted Journal Article (797 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association following peer review. The version of record is available on the JAMIA website at https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw119




You might also like



Downloadable Citations