P. Iannone
University students’ perceptions of summative assessment: the role of context
Iannone, P.; Simpson, A.
Abstract
We report on a mixed-method study that compared students’ perceptions of summative assessment across two distinct disciplines – education and mathematics, at two research-intensive institutions in the UK. The disciplines chosen represent opposing positions in Biglan’s classification of academic disciplines, as well as having very different assessment practices. Results suggest that these education students prefer to be assessed by methods they perceive to discriminate on the basis of academic abilities. Moreover, they perceive the traditional closed-book examination as inadequate to assess the capabilities which are key to being successful in their subject, which fits some but not all of the general findings in the literature. However, comparing these results with those of an identical study with mathematics students, we find that the perceptions of summative assessment are very different. We account for that difference by suggesting that students’ epistemic beliefs play a role in shaping these perceptions and conclude that, in designing summative assessment in higher education, generalised and centralised forces for change need to be tempered by contextual and disciplinary factors.
Citation
Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2017). University students’ perceptions of summative assessment: the role of context. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2016.1177172
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 1, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | May 17, 2016 |
Publication Date | Nov 2, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 6, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 17, 2017 |
Journal | Journal of Further and Higher Education |
Print ISSN | 0309-877X |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-9486 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 41 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 785-801 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2016.1177172 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1398574 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(685 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of Further and Higher Education on 17/05/2016, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177172.
You might also like
A critical evaluation of regression discontinuity studies in school effectiveness research
(2024)
Journal Article
A recipe for disappointment: policy, effect size and the winner’s curse
(2022)
Journal Article
How we assess mathematics degrees: the summative assessment diet a decade on
(2021)
Journal Article