Professor Adrian Simpson adrian.simpson@durham.ac.uk
Principal
The Surprising Persistence of Biglan's Classification Scheme
Simpson, A.
Authors
Abstract
Within higher education systems, different institutions deliver different patterns of disciplines. A simple analysis of the structure of that pattern of disciplines across institutions in one higher education system uncovers a surprising relationship. That is, the key dimensions which describe that structure align nearly perfectly with dimensions discovered in a very different context: the Biglan classification scheme. This paper explains correspondence analysis as a mechanism for uncovering structure in simple contingency tables, shows the accuracy of the fit with Biglan's scheme and demonstrates that the analysis also has a measure of predictive validity in its ability to classify previously unclassified disciplines. The study not only acts as a more accurate validation of Biglan's scheme than those previously undertaken, but indicates that a scheme developed in the USA in the 1970s has current validity in a very different higher education system and suggests disciplines as a core genotype of institutions.
Citation
Simpson, A. (2017). The Surprising Persistence of Biglan's Classification Scheme. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1520-1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1111323
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 18, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 16, 2015 |
Publication Date | 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 19, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 16, 2017 |
Journal | Studies in Higher Education |
Print ISSN | 0307-5079 |
Electronic ISSN | 1470-174X |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 42 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 1520-1531 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1111323 |
Keywords | Disciplines, Higher education systems, Biglan classification scheme. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1397324 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(277 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published online by Taylor & Francis Group in Studies in Higher Education on 16/12/2015, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03075079.2015.1111323
You might also like
A critical evaluation of regression discontinuity studies in school effectiveness research
(2024)
Journal Article
A recipe for disappointment: policy, effect size and the winner’s curse
(2022)
Journal Article
How we assess mathematics degrees: the summative assessment diet a decade on
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search