Q. Guo
Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models
Guo, Q.; Gonzalez-Perez, V.; Guo, Q.; Schaller, M.; Furlong, M.; Bower, R.G.; Cole, S.; Crain, R.A.; Frenk, C.S.; Helly, J.C.; Lacey, C.G.; Lagos, C. d. P.; Mitchell, P.; Schaye, J.; Theuns, T.
Authors
V. Gonzalez-Perez
Q. Guo
M. Schaller
M. Furlong
R.G. Bower
Professor Shaun Cole shaun.cole@durham.ac.uk
Director of the Institute for Computational Cosmology
R.A. Crain
Professor Carlos Frenk c.s.frenk@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Dr John Helly j.c.helly@durham.ac.uk
Chief Experimental Officer
Professor Cedric Lacey cedric.lacey@durham.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
C. d. P. Lagos
P. Mitchell
J. Schaye
Professor Tom Theuns tom.theuns@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
We compare global predictions from the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation, and two semi-analytic (SA) models of galaxy formation, L-GALAXIES and GALFORM. All three models include the key physical processes for the formation and evolution of galaxies and their parameters are calibrated against a small number of observables at z ≈ 0. The two SA models have been applied to merger trees constructed from the EAGLE dark matter only simulation. We find that at z ≤ 2, both the galaxy stellar mass functions for stellar masses M* < 1010.5 M⊙ and the median specific star formation rates (sSFRs) in the three models agree to better than 0.4 dex. The evolution of the sSFR predicted by the three models closely follows the mass assembly history of dark matter haloes. In both EAGLE and L-GALAXIES there are more central passive galaxies with M* < 109.5 M⊙ than in GALFORM. This difference is related to galaxies that have entered and then left a larger halo and which are treated as satellites in GALFORM. In the range 0 < z < 1, the slope of the evolution of the star formation rate density in EAGLE is a factor of ≈1.5 steeper than for the two SA models. The median sizes for galaxies with M* > 109.5 M⊙ differ in some instances by an order of magnitude, while the stellar mass–size relation in EAGLE is a factor of ≈2 tighter than for the two SA models. Our results suggest the need for a revision of how SA models treat the effect of baryonic self-gravity on the underlying dark matter. The treatment of gas flows in the models needs to be revised based on detailed comparison with observations to understand in particular the evolution of the stellar mass–metallicity relation.
Citation
Guo, Q., Gonzalez-Perez, V., Guo, Q., Schaller, M., Furlong, M., Bower, R., …Theuns, T. (2016). Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461(4), 3457-3482. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1525
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 22, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 24, 2016 |
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Sep 28, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 6, 2016 |
Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Print ISSN | 0035-8711 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2966 |
Publisher | Royal Astronomical Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 461 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 3457-3482 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1525 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1396756 |
Related Public URLs | https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00015 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(3.6 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article has been published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
You might also like
The FLAMINGO project: revisiting the S8 tension and the role of baryonic physics
(2023)
Journal Article
The Milky Way’s plane of satellites is consistent with ΛCDM
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search