A note on EFSA’s ongoing efforts to increase transparency of uncertainty in scientific opinions
Sahlin, Ullrika; Troffaes, Matthias C.M.
This is a comment on Lofstedt and Bouder’s paper, which explores the prospects of evidence based uncertainty analysis in Europe, focusing on the ongoing development on uncertainty analysis at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). We very much welcome a discussion on the need to develop better treatment and communication of uncertainty in risk analysis, as we believe that such discussion is long overdue. Lofstedt and Bouder raise many relevant points, in particular the call for evidence based uncertainty analysis. However, there is need to distinguish different types of communication in the discussion and facilitate – not diminish – the description and communication of uncertainty between risk assessors and decision-makers. We find that EFSA has taken steps toward a novel approach to guide their scientific experts and risk assessors in uncertainty analysis based on a modern and scientific view on uncertainty.
Sahlin, U., & Troffaes, M. C. (2021). A note on EFSA’s ongoing efforts to increase transparency of uncertainty in scientific opinions. Journal of Risk Research, 24(5), 545-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313769
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Feb 23, 2017|
|Online Publication Date||Apr 13, 2017|
|Deposit Date||Feb 17, 2017|
|Publicly Available Date||Oct 13, 2018|
|Journal||Journal of Risk Research|
|Publisher||Taylor and Francis Group|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
Accepted Journal Article
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of Risk Research on 13/04/2017, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313769.
You might also like
Decision making under severe uncertainty on a budget
A robust Bayesian analysis of variable selection under prior ignorance