Rosalyn Roberts rosalyn.roberts@durham.ac.uk
Lecturer (Teaching)
Understanding the validity of data: a knowledge-based network underlying research expertise in scientific disciplines
Roberts, R.
Authors
Abstract
This article considers what might be taught to meet a widely held curriculum aim of students being able to understand research in a discipline. Expertise, which may appear as a ‘chain of practice’, is widely held to be underpinned by networks of understanding. Scientific research expertise is considered from this perspective. Within scientific disciplines, how research is conducted to solve different problems varies with concomitant effects on the validity of the data and the strengths of the claims made. Despite this variation, the overarching concepts of validity and reliability and the underpinning and interrelated network of more specific ‘concepts of evidence’ are applicable to understanding a wide range of research designs and the uncertainties in the resultant data and claims. These constituent ideas, which inter alia have been validated as relevant to professional and academic expertise, form an integrated knowledge base about evidence which can be visualised on a concept map. The network of ideas underpinning research expertise across scientific disciplines is outlined. Research from explicitly teaching the concepts of evidence is reported, and the implications for teaching and learning in science-based disciplines in HE are considered.
Citation
Roberts, R. (2016). Understanding the validity of data: a knowledge-based network underlying research expertise in scientific disciplines. Higher Education, 72(5), 651-668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9969-4
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 14, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 25, 2016 |
Publication Date | Nov 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Dec 18, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 18, 2016 |
Journal | Higher Education |
Print ISSN | 0018-1560 |
Electronic ISSN | 1573-174X |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 72 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 651-668 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9969-4 |
Keywords | Concept mapping, Threshold concepts, Expertise Concepts of evidence, Research–teaching links, Uncertainty. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1393603 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Final published version)
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Final published version
Published Journal Article (Advance online version)
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Advance online version
Accepted Journal Article
(2.3 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
You might also like
A concept map for understanding ‘working scientifically’
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search