Vincent M. Reid
The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli
Reid, Vincent M.; Dunn, Kirsty; Young, Robert J.; Amu, Johnson; Donovan, Tim; Reissland, Nadja
Authors
Kirsty Dunn
Robert J. Young
Johnson Amu
Tim Donovan
Professor N Reissland n.n.reissland@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
In the third trimester of pregnancy, the human fetus has the capacity to process perceptual information [1, 2, 3]. With advances in 4D ultrasound technology, detailed assessment of fetal behavior [4] is now possible. Furthermore, modeling of intrauterine conditions has indicated a substantially greater luminance within the uterus than previously thought [5]. Consequently, light conveying perceptual content could be projected through the uterine wall and perceived by the fetus, dependent on how light interfaces with maternal tissue. We do know that human infants at birth show a preference to engage with a top-heavy, face-like stimulus when contrasted with all other forms of stimuli [6, 7]. However, the viability of performing such an experiment based on visual stimuli projected through the uterine wall with fetal participants is not currently known. We examined fetal head turns to visually presented upright and inverted face-like stimuli. Here we show that the fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy is more likely to engage with upright configural stimuli when contrasted to inverted visual stimuli, in a manner similar to results with newborn participants. The current study suggests that postnatal experience is not required for this preference. In addition, we describe a new method whereby it is possible to deliver specific visual stimuli to the fetus. This new technique provides an important new pathway for the assessment of prenatal visual perceptual capacities.
Citation
Reid, V. M., Dunn, K., Young, R. J., Amu, J., Donovan, T., & Reissland, N. (2017). The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli. Current Biology, 27(12), 1825-1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 12, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 9, 2017 |
Publication Date | Jun 19, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jun 9, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 9, 2017 |
Journal | Current Biology |
Print ISSN | 0960-9822 |
Electronic ISSN | 1879-0445 |
Publisher | Cell Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 12 |
Pages | 1825-1828 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1385368 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(767 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Published Journal Article (Advance online version)
(730 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Advance online version © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
Flavor Sensing in Utero and Emerging Discriminative Behaviours in the Human Fetus
(2022)
Journal Article
The effects of induced optical blur on visual search performance and training
(2021)
Journal Article
Foetal mouth movements: Effects of nicotine
(2021)
Journal Article
Effects of maternal mental health on prenatal movement profiles in twins and singletons
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search