Judicial Majoritarianism Revisited: “We, the Other Court”?

Schütze, Robert

Abstract

Re-examines the theory of judicial majoritarianism advanced by Miguel Maduro in respect of the EU internal market, which saw the ECJ as a quasi-legislature which judicially harmonised national rules according to the interests of all Member States. Reflects on the descriptive limitations of Maduro's concept, the normative problems it creates, and the difficulties of its practical test for revealing suspect national rules.

Citation

Schütze, R. (2018). Judicial Majoritarianism Revisited: “We, the Other Court”?. European law review, 43(2), 269-280

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 11, 2017
• Online Publication Date: Apr 9, 2018
• Publication Date: Aug 9, 2018
• Deposit Date: Jun 13, 2017
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 9, 2019
• Journal: European Law Review
• Print ISSN: 0307-5400
• Electronic ISSN: 2754-1800
• Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 43
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 269-280
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1377158
• Publisher URL: http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/catalogue/productdetails.aspx?recordid=427&productid=6968