Clara S. Humpston
Evidence of absence: no relationship between behaviourally measured prediction error response and schizotypy
Humpston, Clara S.; Evans, Lisa H.; Teufel, Christoph; Ihssen, Niklas; Linden, David E.J.
Authors
Lisa H. Evans
Christoph Teufel
Dr Niklas Ihssen niklas.ihssen@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
David E.J. Linden
Abstract
Introduction: The predictive processing framework has attracted much interest in the field of schizophrenia research in recent years, with an increasing number of studies also carried out in healthy individuals with nonclinical psychosis-like experiences. The current research adopted a continuum approach to psychosis and aimed to investigate different types of prediction error responses in relation to psychometrically defined schizotypy. Methods: One hundred and two healthy volunteers underwent a battery of behavioural tasks including (a) a force-matching task, (b) a Kamin blocking task, and (c) a reversal learning task together with three questionnaires measuring domains of schizotypy from different approaches. Results: Neither frequentist nor Bayesian statistical methods supported the notion that alterations in prediction error responses were related to schizotypal traits in any of the three tasks. Conclusions: These null results suggest that deficits in predictive processing associated with clinical states of psychosis are not always present in healthy individuals with schizotypal traits.
Citation
Humpston, C. S., Evans, L. H., Teufel, C., Ihssen, N., & Linden, D. E. (2017). Evidence of absence: no relationship between behaviourally measured prediction error response and schizotypy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 22(5), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2017.1348289
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 22, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 11, 2017 |
Publication Date | Sep 3, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jul 12, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 12, 2017 |
Journal | Cognitive Neuropsychiatry |
Print ISSN | 1354-6805 |
Electronic ISSN | 1464-0619 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 22 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 373-390 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2017.1348289 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1374195 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Final published version)
(2.3 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Final published version
Published Journal Article (Advance online version)
(2.2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Advance online version © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.