J.A. Linker
The Open Flux Problem
Linker, J.A.; Caplan, R.M.; Downs, C.; Riley, P.; Mikic, Z.; Lionello, R.; Henney, C.J.; Arge, C.N.; Liu, Y.; Derosa, M.L.; Yeates, A.; Owens, M.J.
Authors
R.M. Caplan
C. Downs
P. Riley
Z. Mikic
R. Lionello
C.J. Henney
C.N. Arge
Y. Liu
M.L. Derosa
Professor Anthony Yeates anthony.yeates@durham.ac.uk
Professor
M.J. Owens
Abstract
The heliospheric magnetic field is of pivotal importance in solar and space physics. The field is rooted in the Sun's photosphere, where it has been observed for many years. Global maps of the solar magnetic field based on full-disk magnetograms are commonly used as boundary conditions for coronal and solar wind models. Two primary observational constraints on the models are (1) the open field regions in the model should approximately correspond to coronal holes (CHs) observed in emission and (2) the magnitude of the open magnetic flux in the model should match that inferred from in situ spacecraft measurements. In this study, we calculate both magnetohydrodynamic and potential field source surface solutions using 14 different magnetic maps produced from five different types of observatory magnetograms, for the time period surrounding 2010 July. We have found that for all of the model/map combinations, models that have CH areas close to observations underestimate the interplanetary magnetic flux, or, conversely, for models to match the interplanetary flux, the modeled open field regions are larger than CHs observed in EUV emission. In an alternative approach, we estimate the open magnetic flux entirely from solar observations by combining automatically detected CHs for Carrington rotation 2098 with observatory synoptic magnetic maps. This approach also underestimates the interplanetary magnetic flux. Our results imply that either typical observatory maps underestimate the Sun's magnetic flux, or a significant portion of the open magnetic flux is not rooted in regions that are obviously dark in EUV and X-ray emission.
Citation
Linker, J., Caplan, R., Downs, C., Riley, P., Mikic, Z., Lionello, R., …Owens, M. (2017). The Open Flux Problem. Astrophysical Journal, 848(1), Article 70. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8a70
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 2, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 12, 2017 |
Publication Date | Oct 12, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 17, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 19, 2017 |
Journal | Astrophysical Journal |
Print ISSN | 0004-637X |
Publisher | American Astronomical Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 848 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 70 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8a70 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1373667 |
Related Public URLs | https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02342 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(2.2 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
You might also like
Winding and magnetic helicity in periodic domains
(2025)
Journal Article
Persistence and Burn-in in Solar Coronal Magnetic Field Simulations
(2025)
Journal Article
Latitude Quenching Nonlinearity in the Solar Dynamo
(2025)
Journal Article
A New Field Line Tracer for the Study of Coronal Magnetic Topologies
(2024)
Journal Article
The Sun’s Non-Potential Corona over Solar Cycle 24
(2024)
Journal Article