Zooarchaeology and the elusive feast: from performance to aftermath

Rowley-Conwy, P.

Abstract

Ethnographic descriptions of feasts reveal that consumption of meat is usually prominent. Zooarchaeological evidence may thus provide the best way of seeing feasts in the archaeological record. The accumulation of trophy arrays and ongoing high-status activities are confusing behaviours that may be misconstrued as archaeological evidence of feasts. A four-fold classification of zooarchaeological evidence for feasts is put forward: ‘over the top’ (high status); ‘ritually charged garbage’ (often religious); ‘small but special’ (nevertheless sometimes visible); and ‘was this feasting?’ (sometimes equivocal). This typology may allow archaeologists to distinguish between the ethnographic categories of competitive feasts and solidarity feasts.

Citation

Rowley-Conwy, P. (2018). Zooarchaeology and the elusive feast: from performance to aftermath. World Archaeology, 50(2), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1445024

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Feb 16, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Mar 12, 2018
• Publication Date: 2018
• Deposit Date: Feb 16, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 12, 2019
• Journal: World Archaeology
• Print ISSN: 0043-8243
• Electronic ISSN: 1470-1375
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 50
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 221-241
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1445024
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1366293