R.J. Johnston
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
Johnston, R.J.; Boyle, K.J.; Adamowicz, W.; Bennett, J.; Brouwer, R.; Cameron, T.A.; Hanemann, W.M.; Hanley, N.; Scarpa, R.; Tourangeau, R.; Vossler, C.A.
Authors
K.J. Boyle
W. Adamowicz
J. Bennett
R. Brouwer
T.A. Cameron
W.M. Hanemann
N. Hanley
Professor Riccardo Scarpa riccardo.scarpa@durham.ac.uk
Professor
R. Tourangeau
C.A. Vossler
Abstract
This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain, including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.
Citation
Johnston, R., Boyle, K., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T., …Vossler, C. (2017). Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319-405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 23, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 29, 2017 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Mar 22, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 29, 2018 |
Journal | Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists |
Print ISSN | 2333-5955 |
Electronic ISSN | 2333-5963 |
Publisher | The University of Chicago Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 4 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 319-405 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1086/691697 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1361578 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(675 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2017 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
You might also like
An empirical analysis of participation in international environmental agreements
(2023)
Journal Article
Is local and organic produce less satiating? Some evidence from a field experiment
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search