Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Stakeholders’ Perception of the Relevance of Water and Sediment Connectivity in Water and Land Management

Smetanová, A.; Paton, E.; Maynard, C.; Tindale, S.; Fernández-Getino, A.; Marqués Pérez, M.J.; Bracken, L.; Le Bissonnais, Y.; Keesstra, S.

Stakeholders’ Perception of the Relevance of Water and Sediment Connectivity in Water and Land Management Thumbnail


Authors

A. Smetanová

E. Paton

C. Maynard

S. Tindale

A. Fernández-Getino

M.J. Marqués Pérez

L. Bracken

Y. Le Bissonnais

S. Keesstra



Abstract

Using concepts of connectivity in challenges regarding land and water management (flooding, erosion, nutrient leaching, landslides) can only be fully harnessed if knowledge is communicated well between scientists and stakeholders. Proper communication requires prior understanding of end‐users' perception of connectivity as a useful framework. Therefore, we analysed (i) perceptions of ‘connectivity’ for stakeholders involved in water and land management across Europe, (ii) potential for stakeholders to apply connectivity‐related measures in their management decisions, (iii) stakeholders’ biggest challenges in water and land management, and (iv) stakeholders' expectations for future ‘connectivity’ research agendas. We studied 85 questionnaires from 19 countries using a grounded theory approach. One‐third of stakeholders understood connectivity in its scientific context, while 39% perceived connectivity indirectly through their personal experiences (e.g., water and sediment fluxes and erosion). Half of stakeholders’ perceived links and challenges were related to availability of data and methods, communication, and institutions or policy, while others believed they were related to water quality and quantity, soil erosion and quality, and climate change. Half of the stakeholders considered connectivity management important, and one‐third showed high interest in managing connectivity. Adopting connectivity into management is hindered by institutional‐ and policy‐based management limitations, insufficient data and methods, and ineffective knowledge transfer. Explicitly considering heterogeneity of stakeholder perceptions is required for projects regarding management of connectivity at European, national and local scales.

Citation

Smetanová, A., Paton, E., Maynard, C., Tindale, S., Fernández-Getino, A., Marqués Pérez, M., …Keesstra, S. (2018). Stakeholders’ Perception of the Relevance of Water and Sediment Connectivity in Water and Land Management. Land Degradation and Development, 29(6), 1833-1844. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2934

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 11, 2018
Online Publication Date Mar 25, 2018
Publication Date Jun 1, 2018
Deposit Date Mar 26, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 25, 2019
Journal Land Degradation and Development
Print ISSN 1085-3278
Electronic ISSN 1099-145X
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 6
Pages 1833-1844
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2934
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1337001

Files

Accepted Journal Article (873 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the following article: Smetanová, A., Paton, E., Maynard, C., Tindale, S., Fernández-Getino, A., Marqués Pérez, M. J., Bracken, L., Le Bissonnais, Y. & Keesstra, S. (2018). Stakeholders’ Perception of the Relevance of Water and Sediment Connectivity in Water and Land Management. Land Degradation and Development, 29(6): 1833-1844, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2934. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations