Green Devaluation: Disruption, Divestment, and Decommodification for a Green Economy

Knuth, Sarah

Abstract

This paper argues that taking up questions of value can help political ecologists and economists develop a more powerful analysis of the green economy, as it introduces new urban, industrial, and technological dimensions into a self-identified green capitalism. More specifically, I maintain that processes of green devaluation, decommodification, and techno-industrial replacement are as important in understanding green economic development as new value enclosure and green growth. Twenty-first-century green economic politics have been marked by Schumpeterian ambitions and zero-sum intra-capitalist struggles, alongside a more general hardening of anti-fossil fuel industry politics from both grassroots climate justice activists and, increasingly, mainstream investors. I explore three interrelated initiatives—disruptive innovation in Silicon Valley cleantech, the U.S. fossil fuel divestment movement, and the global financial industry’s stranded assets organizing—as windows into these struggles. Themes of devaluation, obsolescence (both technological and “moral”), and (more or less absolute) decommodification carry through this discussion as activists struggle to translate quantitative advances against fossil fuels into a more profound qualitative break. Understanding these fights is essential to developing more effective engaged scholarship on climate change and a just energy transition.

Citation

Knuth, S. (2016). Green Devaluation: Disruption, Divestment, and Decommodification for a Green Economy. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1266001

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 25, 2016
• Online Publication Date: Dec 14, 2016
• Publication Date: Dec 14, 2016
• Deposit Date: May 23, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 28, 2018
• Journal: Capitalism Nature Socialism
• Print ISSN: 1045-5752
• Electronic ISSN: 1548-3290
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 28
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 98-117
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1266001
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1330917