Dr Ana Leite ana.castro-leite@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Do Ambiguous Normative Ingroup Members Increase Tolerance for Deviants?
Leite, Ana C.; Pinto, Isabel R.; Marques, José M.
Authors
Isabel R. Pinto
José M. Marques
Abstract
Subjective group dynamics theory (Marques, Páez, & Abrams, 1998) proposes that deviant ingroup members who threaten the positive value of the group members’ social identity are evaluated negatively. In an experiment, we investigated whether group members evaluate deviant ingroup members less negatively when the normative member’s commitment to the ingroup is ambiguous. Participants evaluated one normative and one deviant ingroup or outgroup member. Two conditions were contrasted, in which the normative target showed high versus low commitment to the group. As predicted, the participants evaluated deviant ingroup targets more negatively and normative ingroup targets more positively than their respective outgroup counterparts – but only when the normative member’s commitment to the ingroup was unambiguous. When presented with a normative member with ambiguous commitment, the deviant ingroup member was evaluated less negatively. We discuss these results in light of subjective group dynamics theory.
Citation
Leite, A. C., Pinto, I. R., & Marques, J. M. (2016). Do Ambiguous Normative Ingroup Members Increase Tolerance for Deviants?. Swiss journal of psychology, 75(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000170
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 11, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 19, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jan 19, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 13, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 13, 2019 |
Journal | Swiss Journal of Psychology |
Print ISSN | 1421-0185 |
Electronic ISSN | 1662-0879 |
Publisher | Hogrefe |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 75 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 47-52 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000170 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1328888 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(396 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Swiss Journal of Psychology, 75, 1, © 2016 by Hogrefe. This version of the article may not completely replicate the final version published in Swiss Journal of Psychology. It is not the version of record and is therefore not suitable for citation.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search