A.G. Marques
“A Right to Lead”: The Role of Leader Legitimacy on Group Reactions to Transgressive Leadership
Marques, A.G.; Pinto, I.R.; Leite, A.C.; Randsley de Moura, G.; van Prooijen, J.-W.; Marques, J.M.
Authors
I.R. Pinto
Dr Ana Leite ana.castro-leite@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
G. Randsley de Moura
J.-W. van Prooijen
J.M. Marques
Abstract
Research on the transgression credit shows that groups may sometimes turn a blind eye to ingroup leaders who transgress moral norms. Although there is substantial research investigating the underlying criteria of what makes a ‘good’ leader, research often neglects to investigate the role of followers in leader-group dynamics. In this paper we offer a novel approach to transgressive leadership by proposing that leader legitimacy is a key factor that determines whether followers’ reactions to transgressive leaders are positive or negative. Across two experiments, participants ascribed transgression credit only to transgressive ingroup leaders perceived as legitimate (Studies 1-2, total n = 308). Transgressive illegitimate leaders were viewed as more threatening to the group, were targeted for formal punishment, received less validation for their behaviour, triggered negative emotions (anger and shame), and raised higher consensus for their removal from the leadership position than did legitimate leaders. This effect also occurred irrespective of the absence of formal social control measures implemented towards the transgressive leader (Study 2). Mediation analysis showed that leader illegitimacy triggered stronger feelings of group threat and stronger negative emotions which, consequently, fuelled agreement with collective protest against the transgressive leader. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Citation
Marques, A., Pinto, I., Leite, A., Randsley de Moura, G., van Prooijen, J.-W., & Marques, J. (2021). “A Right to Lead”: The Role of Leader Legitimacy on Group Reactions to Transgressive Leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12739
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 26, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 17, 2021 |
Publication Date | Apr 18, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 7, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Social Psychology |
Print ISSN | 0021-9029 |
Electronic ISSN | 1559-1816 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 51 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 350-362 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12739 |
Keywords | Leadership; Transgressive leaders; Leader Legitimacy; Transgression Credit; Social Control; Group Dynamics; Collective Protest |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1282508 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(600 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search