Dr Katherine Puddifoot katherine.h.puddifoot@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Dissolving the epistemic/ethical dilemma over implicit bias
Puddifoot, Katherine
Authors
Abstract
It has been argued that humans can face an ethical/epistemic dilemma over the automatic stereotyping involved in implicit bias: ethical demands require that we consistently treat people equally, as equally likely to possess certain traits, but if our aim is knowledge or understanding our responses should reflect social inequalities meaning that members of certain social groups are statistically more likely than others to possess particular features. I use psychological research to argue that often the best choice from the epistemic perspective is the same as the best choice from the ethical perspective: to avoid automatic stereotyping even when this involves failing to reflect social realities in our judgements. This argument has an important implication: it shows that it is not possible to successfully defend an act of automatic stereotyping simply on the basis that the stereotype reflects an aspect of social reality. An act of automatic stereotyping can be poor from an epistemic perspective even if the stereotype that is activated reflects reality.
Citation
Puddifoot, K. (2017). Dissolving the epistemic/ethical dilemma over implicit bias. Philosophical Explorations, 20(sup1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2017.1287295
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 5, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 11, 2017 |
Publication Date | Apr 11, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 22, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 23, 2018 |
Journal | Philosophical Explorations |
Print ISSN | 1386-9795 |
Electronic ISSN | 1741-5918 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 20 |
Issue | sup1 |
Pages | 73-93 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2017.1287295 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1315412 |
Related Public URLs | https://birmingham-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=44BIR_PURE_DSpublications%2Fbe772e2a-3c78-441e-9a02-3f89c26fe523&context=L&vid=44BIR_VU1&lang=en_US&search_scope=LSCOP_44BIR_RES_PUB&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=loca |
Files
Published Journal Article
(449 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
You might also like
Understanding bias through diverse lenses
(2024)
Journal Article
Knowing your past: Trauma, stress, and mnemonic epistemic injustice
(2024)
Journal Article
Fear Generalization and Mnemonic Injustice
(2024)
Journal Article
Poverty, Stereotypes and Politics: Counting the Epistemic Costs
(2023)
Book Chapter
Epistemic Agency and the Generalisation of Fear
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search