AMPing Racial Attitudes: Comparing the Power of Explicit and Implicit Racism Measures in 2008

Ditonto, Tessa M.; Lau, Richard R.; Sears, David O.

Abstract

In 2008, ANES included for the first time—along with standard explicit measures of old-fashioned and symbolic racism—the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), a relatively new implicit measure of racial attitudes. This article examines the extent to which four different measures of racial prejudice (three explicit and one implicit) predict public opinion during and after the 2008 election, including Americans' views towards several racial policy issues, their evaluations of, and feelings toward, Barack Obama, and their attitudes toward a Black president in general. Oversamples of African American and Latino respondents in the 2008 ANES enable us to broaden our tests of these measures beyond traditional White samples. We find that racial prejudice played an important role for all racial/ethnic groups but that the traditional explicit measures of racism are by far the stronger predictors for all of our dependent variables (compared to the new implicit measure) for both White and Black respondents. Surprisingly, the AMP adds clear explanatory power only to models in the Latino sample.

Citation

Ditonto, T. M., Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (2013). AMPing Racial Attitudes: Comparing the Power of Explicit and Implicit Racism Measures in 2008. Political Psychology, 34(4), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12013

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Online Publication Date: Feb 18, 2013
• Publication Date: 2013-08
• Deposit Date: Dec 5, 2019
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 15, 2021
• Journal: Political Psychology
• Print ISSN: 0162-895X
• Electronic ISSN: 1467-9221
• Publisher: Wiley
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 34
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 487-510
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12013
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1312347