Solène Marion
A systematic review of methods for studying the impacts of outdoor recreation on terrestrial wildlife
Marion, Solène; Davies, Althea; Demšar, Urška; Irvine, R. Justin; Stephens, Philip A.; Long, Jed
Authors
Althea Davies
Urška Demšar
R. Justin Irvine
Professor Philip Stephens philip.stephens@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Jed Long
Abstract
Outdoor recreation is a known source of disturbance to many wildlife populations. We systematically reviewed 126 relevant papers that study the impact of outdoor recreation on wildlife, focusing on terrestrial wildlife (birds excluded) to assess the different methodological approaches adopted by researchers. We characterised the research methods into seven categories (direct observation, indirect observation (field-based), telemetry, camera traps, physiological measurement, trapping, and simulation). We find that direct observation is the most commonly used method to capture human-wildlife interactions, followed by the use of telemetry, and camera traps. The animals most commonly studied were ungulates, and the orders Carnivora and Rodentia. Studies typically captured data over longer periods (median 54 months) when using trapping methods; other methods exhibited shorter study durations (median 22 months). The size of the animal under study appears to influence how methods are chosen, with larger species often being studied using telemetry methods. We highlight advantages and disadvantages of each method depending on the aims of the study, the focal species, and the type of outdoor recreation. Our review highlights the need for simultaneous measurements of both human activity and wildlife response. We also recommend that researchers consider how to capture both short- and long-term impacts on animal welfare. Our findings should guide applied wildlife conservation and management research in scenarios where human-wildlife interactions lead to conservation issues.
Citation
Marion, S., Davies, A., Demšar, U., Irvine, R. J., Stephens, P. A., & Long, J. (2020). A systematic review of methods for studying the impacts of outdoor recreation on terrestrial wildlife. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, Article e00917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00917
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 10, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 14, 2020 |
Publication Date | May 30, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jan 14, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 21, 2020 |
Journal | Global Ecology and Conservation |
Electronic ISSN | 2351-9894 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 22 |
Article Number | e00917 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00917 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1310344 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the
CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
Removing Human Bottlenecks in Bird Classification Using Camera Trap Images and Deep Learning
(2023)
Journal Article
Multi-lingual literature searches are needed to unveil global knowledge
(2023)
Journal Article
Drivers of the changing abundance of European birds at two spatial scales
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search