Sirpa Saario
Doing ‘Ethics Work’ Together: Negotiating Service Users’ Independence in Community Mental Health Meetings
Saario, Sirpa; Räsänen, Jenni-Mari; Raitakari, Suvi; Banks, Sarah; Juhila, Kirsi
Authors
Jenni-Mari Räsänen
Suvi Raitakari
Professor Sarah Banks s.j.banks@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Kirsi Juhila
Abstract
This article develops the concept of ‘ethics work’ (Banks [2016]. “Everyday Ethics in Professional Life: Social Work as Ethics Work.” Ethics and Social Welfare 10 (1): 35–52) from a focus on efforts made by professionals, to a domain co-constructed with service users and others. It takes an ethnomethodological approach to examining verbatim interactions in review (multi-party) meetings concerned with reviewing progress and making decisions about and with service users in community mental health settings in England and Finland. Drawing on the everyday, micro-level ethics of social welfare practice, this article demonstrates the ‘doing of ethics’ in real-life situations, thus widening the applicability of ‘ethics work’ as an analytical concept. Extracts from two meetings are discussed, focussing on the ethical challenges of supporting service users to live independent lives, while also protecting them from harm and respecting their own choices. While this is a classic ethical tension in social welfare work, it is also exacerbated in the current austerity regimes in many Western countries as service users and carers are ‘responsibilised’ and required to become more self-sufficient. Our analysis shows the significant ethical content in review meetings as professionals, service users and family members negotiate plans together.
Citation
Saario, S., Räsänen, J.-M., Raitakari, S., Banks, S., & Juhila, K. (2018). Doing ‘Ethics Work’ Together: Negotiating Service Users’ Independence in Community Mental Health Meetings. Ethics and Social Welfare, 12(4), 370-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2018.1533991
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 31, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 17, 2018 |
Publication Date | 2018 |
Deposit Date | Feb 1, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 17, 2019 |
Journal | Ethics and Social Welfare |
Print ISSN | 1749-6535 |
Electronic ISSN | 1749-6543 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 370-386 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2018.1533991 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1308696 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(794 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Ethics and social welfare on 17 December 2018 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17496535.2018.1533991
You might also like
Pandemic ethics and beyond: Creating space for virtues in the social professions
(2023)
Journal Article
Ethical issues in community development: setting the scene
(2022)
Journal Article
Law Versus Morality: Cases and Commentaries on Ethical Issues in Social Work Practice
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search