Jun Hou
A comparison between semi-analytical gas cooling models and cosmological hydrodynamical simulations
Hou, Jun; Lacey, Cedric G; Frenk, Carlos S
Authors
Professor Cedric Lacey cedric.lacey@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Professor Carlos Frenk c.s.frenk@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
We compare the mass cooling rates and cumulative cooled-down masses predicted by several semi-analytical (SA) cooling models with cosmological hydrodynamical simulations performed using the AREPO code (ignoring processes such as feedback and chemical enrichment). The SA cooling models are the new GALFORM cooling model introduced in Hou et al. (2017), along with two earlier GALFORM cooling models and the L-GALAXIES and MORGANA cooling models. We find that the predictions of the new GALFORM cooling model are generally in best agreement with the simulations. For halos with Mhalo ≲ 3 × 1011 M⊙, the SA models predict that the timescale for radiative cooling is shorter than or comparable to the gravitational infall timescale. Even though SA models assume that gas falls onto galaxies from a spherical gas halo, while the simulations show that the cold gas is accreted through filaments, both methods predict similar mass cooling rates, because in both cases the gas accretion occurs on similar timescales. For halos with Mhalo ≳ 1012 M⊙, gas in the simulations typically cools from a roughly spherical hot gas halo, as assumed in the SA models, but the halo gas gradually contracts during cooling, leading to compressional heating. SA models ignore this heating, and so overestimate mass cooling rates by factors of a few. At low redshifts halo major mergers or a sequence of successive smaller mergers are seen in the simulations to strongly heat the halo gas and suppress cooling, while mergers at high redshifts do not suppress cooling, because the gas filaments are difficult to heat up. The new SA cooling model best captures these effects.
Citation
Hou, J., Lacey, C. G., & Frenk, C. S. (2019). A comparison between semi-analytical gas cooling models and cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486(2), 1691-1717. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz730
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 11, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 14, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Mar 19, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 19, 2019 |
Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Print ISSN | 0035-8711 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2966 |
Publisher | Royal Astronomical Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 486 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 1691-1717 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz730 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(6.3 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Published Journal Article
(16.4 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
A new gas cooling model for semi-analytic galaxy formation models
(2017)
Journal Article
Hidden depths in the local Universe: The Stellar Stream Legacy Survey
(2023)
Journal Article
PyAutoGalaxy: Open-Source Multiwavelength Galaxy Structure & Morphology
(2023)
Journal Article
Testing strong lensing subhalo detection with a cosmological simulation
(2022)
Journal Article