Catalina Goanta
What Determines National Convergence of EU Law? Measuring the Implementation of Consumer Sales Law,
Goanta, Catalina; Siems, Mathias
Authors
Mathias Siems
Abstract
Harmonisation and legal convergence are core tasks of the European Union. This article explores the question about the determinants for national convergence of EU law, specifically applied to the ever-growing body of European consumer sales law. The measurement of national convergence is based on a unique coding of five directives in seven Member States. Using the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method, the article finds that differences in national convergence can partly be explained by favourable features of the corresponding directives; however, mainly, they are the result of a combination of domestic political factors and, to a lesser extent, the country characteristics. This has important policy implications, for instance, on the need to ‘bring in politics’ in the debate about convergence, harmonisation and consumer sales law.
Citation
Goanta, C., & Siems, M. (2019). What Determines National Convergence of EU Law? Measuring the Implementation of Consumer Sales Law,. Legal Studies, 39(4), 714-734. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.8
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Sep 6, 2019 |
Publication Date | Dec 31, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Aug 1, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 1, 2019 |
Journal | Legal Studies |
Print ISSN | 0261-3875 |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-121X |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 714-734 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.8 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1296917 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(302 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in Legal studies http://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.8. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © The Society of Legal Scholars 2019.
You might also like
Foreign-trained legal scholars in the UK: ‘irritants’ or ‘change agents’?
(2021)
Journal Article
The Power of Comparative Law: What Types of Units Can Comparative Law Compare?
(2019)
Journal Article
The law and ethics of ‘cultural appropriation’
(2019)
Journal Article
The Illusion of Motion: Corporate (Im)Mobility and the Failed Promise of Centros
(2019)
Journal Article
The Chinese Social Credit System: A Model for Other Countries?
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search