Richard R. Lau
Effect of Media Environment Diversity and Advertising Tone on Information Search, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization
Lau, Richard R.; Andersen, David J.; Ditonto, Tessa M.; Kleinberg, Mona S.; Redlawsk, David P.
Authors
Dr David Andersen david.j.andersen@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Dr Tessa Ditonto tessa.m.ditonto@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Mona S. Kleinberg
David P. Redlawsk
Abstract
This paper examines the effects of our modern media environment on affective polarization. We conducted an experiment during the last month of the 2012 presidential election varying both the choice of media sources available about the major presidential candidates, and the tone of political advertisements presented to subjects. We posit that voters in a high-choice, ideologically-diverse media environment will exhibit greater affective polarization than those in a “mainstream” ideologically neutral environment. We also hypothesize that subjects who are exposed to negative rather than positive political advertisements will show increased affective polarization. We provide causal evidence that the combination of a high-choice ideologically diverse media environment and exposure to negative political ads, significantly increases affective polarization. We also find that both overall information search and selective exposure to information are influenced by our experimental manipulations, with the greatest amount of search, and the most biased search, conducted by Romney supporters in the Negative Ads, Diverse Media condition.
Citation
Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., Ditonto, T. M., Kleinberg, M. S., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2017). Effect of Media Environment Diversity and Advertising Tone on Information Search, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization. Political Behavior, 39(1), 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jul 28, 2016 |
Publication Date | 2017-03 |
Deposit Date | Dec 5, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 12, 2021 |
Journal | Political Behavior |
Print ISSN | 0190-9320 |
Electronic ISSN | 1573-6687 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 231-255 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1281798 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a journal article published in Political Behavior. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9354-8
You might also like
Beyond the Presidency, 2016: Women Candidates in Down-Ballot Races
(2020)
Book Chapter
Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search