Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Simplistic policy, skewed consequences: Taking stock of English physical education, school sport and physical activity policy since 2013

Lindsey, I.; Metcalfe, S.; Gemar, A.; Armstrong, J.; Alderman, J.

Simplistic policy, skewed consequences: Taking stock of English physical education, school sport and physical activity policy since 2013 Thumbnail


Authors

Profile image of Sarah Harding

Sarah Harding sarah.n.harding@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy

A. Gemar

J. Armstrong

J. Alderman



Abstract

The period from 2013 to 2019 was one of relative continuity in policies for physical education (PE), school sport and physical activity (PESSPA) in England. Starting from the advent of the government’s flagship PE and Sport Premium (PES Premium) initiative in 2013, the end of the period was reached 20 with renewed uncertainty in 2020 about the future of PESSPA policy. It is therefore an appropriate point for this article to ‘take stock’ of PESSPA policies and their consequences since 2013. The political science literature on policy design underpins the approach to considering the mix of both policy goals and those instruments used by governments to achieve them. To do so, a comprehensive set of policy documents, published reports, academic literature and empirical research on schools’ use of the PES Premium was interrogated. Policy goals articulated by government since 2013 reinforced, rather than resolved, long-standing debates about the purpose of PESSPA. Health-related objectives rose in prominence, but sat uneasily alongside continued commitments to competitive sport. Only a narrow range of the policy instruments available to governments were used in pursuit of their policy goals. PES Premium funding was solely distributed to primary schools, with limited use of regulation and information systems to shape PESSPA provision. These aspects of policy design contributed to increasing reliance on external coaches in primary schools and indicators of a decline in secondary school provision and participation, resonant of prioritisation of short-term approaches over longer-term strategic development. Possibilities for improving future PESSPA policies are considered as a result.

Citation

Lindsey, I., Metcalfe, S., Gemar, A., Armstrong, J., & Alderman, J. (2021). Simplistic policy, skewed consequences: Taking stock of English physical education, school sport and physical activity policy since 2013. European Physical Education Review, 27(2), 278-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x20939111

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 12, 2020
Online Publication Date Jul 22, 2020
Publication Date May 1, 2021
Deposit Date Jun 12, 2020
Publicly Available Date Aug 11, 2020
Journal European Physical Education Review
Print ISSN 1356-336X
Electronic ISSN 1741-2749
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Issue 2
Pages 278-296
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x20939111
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1268519

Files

Published Journal Article (Advance online version) (318 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Advance online version This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).





You might also like



Downloadable Citations