Dr Akansha Singh akansha.singh@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Multisite educational trials: estimating the effect size and its confidence intervals
Singh, A.; Uwimpuhwe, G.; Li, M.; Einbeck, J.; Higgins, S.; Kasim, A.
Authors
Germaine Uwimpuhwe germaine.uwimpuhwe@durham.ac.uk
sTATISTICIAN
M. Li
Professor Jochen Einbeck jochen.einbeck@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Professor Steven Higgins s.e.higgins@durham.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
A. Kasim
Abstract
In education, multisite trials involve randomisation of pupils into intervention and comparison groups within schools. Most analytical models in multisite educational trials ignore that the impact of an intervention may be school dependent. This study investigates the impact of statistical models on the uncertainty associated with an effect size using comparable outcomes and covariates from ten multisite educational trials funded by the UK’s Education Endowment Foundation. Ordinary least squares (OLS) models often assume that the pupil’s outcomes within schools are independent, which is not always true. Multilevel models address this limitation by incorporating heterogeneity between schools to account for intra-school dependency. This inflates the confidence interval of an effect size obtained from the multilevel models than from an OLS model. For a multisite trial, the heterogeneity between schools also includes the differences in the expected impact of intervention between schools. Ignoring this additional school-by-intervention variation in a multisite trial could affect both its interpretation and conclusions. A robust approach to estimate the confidence intervals for effect size from multisite trials is by treating effect size as a parameter with its distribution. This paper is important for evaluating evidence from multisite trials by accounting for all sources of variability.
Citation
Singh, A., Uwimpuhwe, G., Li, M., Einbeck, J., Higgins, S., & Kasim, A. (2022). Multisite educational trials: estimating the effect size and its confidence intervals. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(1), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2021.1882416
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 25, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 15, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022 |
Deposit Date | Nov 30, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 15, 2022 |
Journal | International Journal of Research & Method in Education |
Print ISSN | 1743-727X |
Electronic ISSN | 1743-7288 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 45 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 18-38 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2021.1882416 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1256282 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(1 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International journal of research & method in education on 15 February 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1882416
You might also like
Biodose Tools: an R shiny application for biological dosimetry
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search