S.S Li
Resolution of the paradox of the diamagnetic effect on the Kibble Coil
Li, S.S; Schlamminger, S.; Marangoni, R.; Wang, Q.; Haddad, D.; Seifert, F.; Chao, L.; Newell, D.; Zhao, W.
Authors
S. Schlamminger
R. Marangoni
Dr Qing Wang qing.wang@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
D. Haddad
F. Seifert
L. Chao
D. Newell
W. Zhao
Abstract
Employing very simple electro-mechanical principles known from classical physics, the Kibble balance establishes a very precise and absolute link between quantum electrical standards and macroscopic mass or force measurements. The success of the Kibble balance, in both determining fundamental constants (h, NA, e) and realizing a quasi-quantum mass in the 2019 newly revised International System of Units, relies on the perfection of Maxwell’s equations and the symmetry they describe between Lorentz’s force and Faraday’s induction, a principle and a symmetry stunningly demonstrated in the weighing and velocity modes of Kibble balances to within 1×10−8, with nothing but imperfect wires and magnets. However, recent advances in the understanding of the current effect in Kibble balances reveal a troubling paradox. A diamagnetic effect, a force that does not cancel between mass-on and mass-off measurement, is challenging balance maker’s assumptions of symmetry at levels that are almost two orders of magnitude larger than the reported uncertainties. The diamagnetic effect, if it exists, shows up in weighing mode without a readily apparent reciprocal effect in the velocity mode, begging questions about systematic errors at the very foundation of the new measurement system. The hypothetical force is caused by the coil current changing the magnetic field, producing an unaccounted force that is systematically modulated with the weighing current. Here we show that this diamagnetic force exists, but the additional force does not change the equivalence between weighing and velocity measurements. We reveal the unexpected way that symmetry is preserved and show that for typical materials and geometries the total relative effect on the measurement is ≈1×10−9.
Citation
Li, S., Schlamminger, S., Marangoni, R., Wang, Q., Haddad, D., Seifert, F., Chao, L., Newell, D., & Zhao, W. (2021). Resolution of the paradox of the diamagnetic effect on the Kibble Coil. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 1048. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80173-9
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 15, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 13, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021 |
Deposit Date | Dec 16, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 9, 2021 |
Journal | Scientific Reports |
Publisher | Nature Research |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Article Number | 1048 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80173-9 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1255275 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(2.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
You might also like
Air-Gapped Current Transformer simulation and accuracy assessment
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Structure health monitoring of concrete structures using magnetic flux leakage
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
A comparison of air pollution in developed and developing cities: A case study of London and Beijing
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search