Catherine Cassell
Understanding inclusion in the retail industry: incorporating the majority perspective
Cassell, Catherine; Watson, Kathryn; Ford, Jacqueline; Kele, Juliet
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this paper is to move away from the focus upon the drivers of diversity to consider the drivers of inclusion in the workplace. The research outlined addresses this by considering the views of all employees, not just those who would be considered members of minority groups. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on an extensive set of case study data from a range of methodological sources. The case study is of a major high street retailer. Findings Findings focus upon what leads to employees feeling included in the workplace. In addressing this we explore both the drivers of, and barriers to, inclusion. We argue that inclusion is complex and that individuals may feel included by some aspects of organisational culture whilst simultaneously feeling excluded by others. Practical implications The implications of our results for HR practitioners are that organisations need to pay attention to general HR policies as ways of enhancing inclusion, for example development practices, but also pay attention to the different needs of diverse groups. Originality/value The paper is original in that in recognising that equality, diversity and inclusion are all closely related, we demonstrate that an understanding of the effectiveness of diversity strategies needs to be fundamentally informed by a consideration of inclusion which can only occur through an engagement with employee's understandings of organisational culture and their place or otherwise within it. Without this employee engagement, many well-intentioned diversity initiatives may go awry. Moreover, the value of the research is that it demonstrates that in order to be successful an inclusion strategy needs to embrace both minority and majority perspectives.
Citation
Cassell, C., Watson, K., Ford, J., & Kele, J. (2022). Understanding inclusion in the retail industry: incorporating the majority perspective. Personnel Review, 51(1), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2020-0083
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 28, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 27, 2021 |
Publication Date | Mar 11, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 6, 2021 |
Journal | Personnel Review |
Print ISSN | 0048-3486 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 51 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 230-250 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2020-0083 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1254634 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(290 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com.
You might also like
If philosophers went on a leadership course: A (serious) farce in three Acts
(2022)
Journal Article
Re/searching leadership: A critique in Two Agonies and Nine Fits
(2022)
Journal Article
Leadership and Identities: Towards more critical relational approaches
(2021)
Book Chapter
Matter that embodies: Agentive flesh and working body/selves
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search