Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A robust Bayesian bias-adjusted random effects model for consideration of uncertainty about bias terms in evidence synthesis

Raices Cruz, Ivette; Troffaes, Matthias C.M.; Lindström, Johan; Sahlin, Ullrika

A robust Bayesian bias-adjusted random effects model for consideration of uncertainty about bias terms in evidence synthesis Thumbnail


Authors

Ivette Raices Cruz

Johan Lindström

Ullrika Sahlin



Abstract

Meta-analysis is a statistical method used in evidence synthesis for combining, analyzing and summarizing studies that have the same target endpoint and aims to derive a pooled quantitative estimate using fixed and random effects models or network models. Differences among included studies depend on variations in target populations (i.e. heterogeneity) and variations in study quality due to study design and execution (i.e. bias). The risk of bias is usually assessed qualitatively using critical appraisal, and quantitative bias analysis can be used to evaluate the influence of bias on the quantity of interest. We propose a way to consider ignorance or ambiguity in how to quantify bias terms in a bias analysis by characterizing bias with imprecision (as bounds on probability) and use robust Bayesian analysis to estimate the overall effect. Robust Bayesian analysis is here seen as Bayesian updating performed over a set of coherent probability distributions, where the set emerges from a set of bias terms. We show how the set of bias terms can be specified based on judgments on the relative magnitude of biases (i.e., low, unclear and high risk of bias) in one or several domains of the Cochrane’s risk of bias table. For illustration, we apply a robust Bayesian bias-adjusted random effects model to an already published meta-analysis on the effect of Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Citation

Raices Cruz, I., Troffaes, M. C., Lindström, J., & Sahlin, U. (2022). A robust Bayesian bias-adjusted random effects model for consideration of uncertainty about bias terms in evidence synthesis. Statistics in Medicine, 41(17), 3365-3379. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9422

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 12, 2022
Online Publication Date Apr 29, 2022
Publication Date Jul 30, 2022
Deposit Date Oct 1, 2021
Publicly Available Date May 3, 2022
Journal Statistics in Medicine
Print ISSN 0277-6715
Electronic ISSN 1097-0258
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 41
Issue 17
Pages 3365-3379
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9422
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1232603
Related Public URLs https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.10645

Files

Published Journal Article (1.4 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations