Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The retrospective (im)moralization of self-plagiarism: Power interests in the social construction of new norms for publishing

Callahan, J.L.

Authors



Abstract

The ‘scourge of self-plagiarism’ has begun to find a place in the discourse of organization and management scholarship. Whether a real issue of concern or a moral panic, self-plagiarism has captured the attention of authors, editors, publishers, and plagiarism-detection software companies. The types of behaviors castigated as self-plagiarism and the severity of approach toward those behaviors vary, as power brokers in the publishing process argue they hold an ethical high ground. Yet, little has been done to problematize self-plagiarism as a concept and how, and why, it came to occupy such a central role in the academic discourse. In this article, I explore these issues and argue that self-plagiarism is a misnomer that has been retrospectively (im)moralized through regimes of power. I review the spectrum of behaviors that now fall under the self-plagiarism umbrella and problematize issues associated with self-plagiarism. I identify and challenge the power interests that are negotiating the spaces in which self-plagiarism has risen to the forefront and present a call to action to more transparently, and ethically, deal with issues that are currently labeled as ‘self-plagiarism’. Furthermore, in presenting this article, I engage in a form of ‘guerrilla plagiarism’ to resist the appropriation of my authorial voice by power elites in the institutional field of publishing.

Citation

Callahan, J. (2018). The retrospective (im)moralization of self-plagiarism: Power interests in the social construction of new norms for publishing. Organization, 25(3), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417734926

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Oct 26, 2017
Publication Date 2018-05
Deposit Date Oct 19, 2021
Journal Organization
Print ISSN 1350-5084
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 25
Issue 3
Pages 305-319
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417734926
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1226625