Professor Barry Sheils barry.a.sheils@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Style emerged into discursive prominence in nineteenth-century Europe at the same time as the classical symptoms of hysteria were given new impetus by neurologists and psychoanalysts. Later, when the Post-War architecture of late capitalism seemed to spell the end of style, ‘in the sense of the unique and the personal, the end of the individual brushstroke’ (Fredric Jameson), hysteria started to disappear as a psychiatric diagnosis. To explore how style’s structural affinity with hysteria remains current, even as the professionalisation of the Humanities ensures it is disavowed, the first part of this essay redeploys D. W. Winnicott’s idea of ‘transitional phenomena’. I describe the hysterical predicament of the Humanities scholar who is unable to make or find an object of knowledge sufficient to end the distress of their interests. The second part of the essay demonstrates how autobiographic fictions foreground the hysteria of style. Here I place Brigid Brophy, writing in the 1960s and 70s, and Ben Lerner, writing in the first decades of this millennium, in genealogical relation. I observe how the historical swing from 1970s ‘metafiction’ to contemporary ‘autofiction’ registers the interminable predicament of style. Style, I argue, enacts a curiously insistent mode of withdrawal from objectivity. It displaces the object of literary study and preserves its vulnerability through a structure of communicative reticence.
Sheils, B. (2022). Style Interminable: the autofictional object of the Humanities in works by Brigid Brophy and Ben Lerner. Textual Practice, 36(4), 518-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2022.2055284
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 15, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 8, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jan 28, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | May 3, 2022 |
Journal | Textual Practice |
Print ISSN | 0950-236X |
Electronic ISSN | 1470-1308 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 518-541 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2022.2055284 |
Keywords | hysteria; autofiction; symptomatic reading; literature and identification; pronouns; reticence; literary embodiment; Ronald Firbank |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1218093 |
Published Journal Article
(2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Clickbait Modernism
(2024)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search