Xiaoyue Cao
Systematic Errors Induced by the Elliptical Power-law model in Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lens Modeling
Cao, Xiaoyue; Li, Ran; Nightingale, J.W.; Massey, Richard; Robertson, Andrew; Frenk, Carlos S.; Amvrosiadis, Aristeidis; Amorisco, Nicola C.; He, Qiuhan; Etherington, Amy; Cole, Shaun; Zhu, Kai
Authors
Ran Li
James Nightingale james.w.nightingale@durham.ac.uk
Academic Visitor
Professor Richard Massey r.j.massey@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Dr Andrew Robertson andrew.robertson@durham.ac.uk
Academic Visitor
Professor Carlos Frenk c.s.frenk@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Aristeidis Amvrosiadis aristeidis.amvrosiadis@durham.ac.uk
Post Doctoral Research Associate
Nicola C. Amorisco
Dr Qiuhan He qiuhan.he@durham.ac.uk
Post Doctoral Research Associate
Amy Etherington amy.etherington@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy
Shaun Cole
Kai Zhu
Abstract
The elliptical power-law (EPL) model of the mass in a galaxy is widely used in strong gravitational lensing analyses. However, the distribution of mass in real galaxies is more complex. We quantify the biases due to this model mismatch by simulating and then analysing mock Hubble Space Telescope imaging of lenses with mass distributions inferred from SDSS-MaNGA stellar dynamics data. We find accurate recovery of source galaxy morphology, except for a slight tendency to infer sources to be more compact than their true size. The Einstein radius of the lens is also robustly recovered with 0.1% accuracy, as is the global density slope, with 2.5% relative systematic error, compared to the 3.4% intrinsic dispersion. However, asymmetry in real lenses also leads to a spurious fitted ‘external shear’ with typical strength, γext = 0.015. Furthermore, time delays inferred from lens modelling without measurements of stellar dynamics are typically underestimated by ∼5%. Using such measurements from a sub-sample of 37 lenses would bias measurements of the Hubble constant H0 by ∼9%. Although this work is based on a particular set of MaNGA galaxies, and the specific value of the detected biases may change for another set of strong lenses, our results strongly suggest the next generation cosmography needs to use more complex lens mass models.
Citation
Cao, X., Li, R., Nightingale, J., Massey, R., Robertson, A., Frenk, C. S., Amvrosiadis, A., Amorisco, N. C., He, Q., Etherington, A., Cole, S., & Zhu, K. (2022). Systematic Errors Induced by the Elliptical Power-law model in Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lens Modeling. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22(2), https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac3f2b
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 27, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 2, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2022-02 |
Deposit Date | Jun 14, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 27, 2022 |
Journal | Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics |
Print ISSN | 1674-4527 |
Publisher | IOP Publishing |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 22 |
Issue | 2 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac3f2b |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1201108 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(3.6 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the Accepted Manuscript version of an article accepted for publication in Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is available online at https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac3f2b
You might also like
Abell 1201: detection of an ultramassive black hole in a strong gravitational lens
(2023)
Journal Article
PyAutoGalaxy: Open-Source Multiwavelength Galaxy Structure & Morphology
(2023)
Journal Article
Testing strong lensing subhalo detection with a cosmological simulation
(2022)
Journal Article
Automated galaxy-galaxy strong lens modelling: No lens left behind
(2022)
Journal Article
Galaxy–galaxy strong lens perturbations: line-of-sight haloes versus lens subhaloes
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search