Friederike EL Otto
Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The Role of the social Superstructure Narrative
Otto, Friederike EL; Minnerop, Petra; Raju, Emmanuel; Harrington, Luke J; Stuart-Smith, Rupert F; Boyd, Emily; James, Rachel; Jones, Richard; Lauta, Kristian C
Authors
Professor Petra Minnerop petra.minnerop@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Emmanuel Raju
Luke J Harrington
Rupert F Stuart-Smith
Emily Boyd
Rachel James
Richard Jones
Kristian C Lauta
Abstract
Climate litigation has become a strategic tool to push for climate justice, including compensation for losses caused by climate change. Many cases rely on the establishment of a causal relationship between the defendants’ emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) and the plaintiffs' losses. All decided cases seeking compensation for a concrete climate related impact have been unsuccessful (thus far). Legal scholars as well as social and natural scientists have looked at individual cases and evidence of these unsuccessful claims, aiming to identify legal and scientific hurdles. Based on previous research where we analysed specific cases, we step back from a case-specific analysis in this article and identify the social context in which law and science operate and intersect. We assert that without a general understanding of the urgency of climate change and the scientifically proven fact that climate change impacts the present, and that it is possible to attribute individual losses to human caused climate change, the fate and future of climate litigation focusing on losses and damages will continue to encounter major obstacles in courts. This is despite the increasingly sophisticated strategies of litigants; the positive outcome of some strategic litigation and improvements in the field of climate science, all of which would be expected to sway for a successful future of the fight against climate change.
Citation
Otto, F. E., Minnerop, P., Raju, E., Harrington, L. J., Stuart-Smith, R. F., Boyd, E., James, R., Jones, R., & Lauta, K. C. (2022). Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The Role of the social Superstructure Narrative. Global Policy, 13(5), 736-750. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13113
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 23, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 27, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2022-11 |
Deposit Date | Jul 5, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 7, 2023 |
Journal | Global Policy |
Print ISSN | 1758-5880 |
Electronic ISSN | 1758-5899 |
Publisher | Durham University |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 736-750 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13113 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1199629 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(641 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Authors. Global Policy published by Durham University and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
You might also like
Climate Causality: From Causation to Attribution
(2024)
Book Chapter
Article VIII WTO Agreement, Status of the WTO
(2022)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search